Toronto 2015 Review: HIGH RISE Throws A Lot Of Stuff Off The Ledge

Contributing Writer; Toronto, Canada (@triflic)
Sign-In to Vote
Toronto 2015 Review: HIGH RISE Throws A Lot Of Stuff Off The Ledge
As audience empathy tests go, killing the dog is perhaps the most capital of movie-crimes. Here it is gleefully committed in the opening minutes; a bellwether for the casually curious to beware. 

Several other canine-murders are peppered throughout the film, each more grim than the last, lest you miss the point. Subtlety, of course, is not the aim here; the film's central and titular edifice is a super-sized, dangerously insular apartment building where the floors at the top are bent, both figuratively, and literally; a representation of 'society' in microcosm.

And we, at long last, arrive at the point where the oft-juggled adaptation of J.G. Ballard's 1975 novel, High Rise, makes it to the screen. At one point director Nicolas Roeg was scheduled to make it, at another Vincenzo Natali was attached. Ben Wheatley (and his writing partner, Amy Jump) deliver a retro-futurist grotesquerie of hate and suffering. A cinematic endurance test, as it were. Wheatley has never been one to let a lot of empathy get in the way of his comically brutal style of filmmaking, and he has managed to squeeze out every last drop of it. This is triple distilled satire, to be served cold with a garnish of mania.

Tom Hiddleston, here a lean but blank slate, plays Dr. Robert Laing. A successful neurosurgeon recently recovering from an vaguely alluded to family tragedy, he is looking for both anonymity as well as a way to move up the socioeconomic ladder. This disturbingly massive condo tower is built on the edge of nowhere. Seagulls cry desperately on the soundtrack, often, but are never seen. We see only their shit dropping from the sky onto the endless field of 1970s automobiles and parking-lot skirting the building. 

It is a recognizable kind of addled future-version of Britain along the lines of Brazil, only with far more smoking, and sideburns (courtesy of an unrecognizable Luke Evans). Wheatley has set the film at about the same time as the publication of Ballard's novel. An interesting choice, because the promise of the future looks stale, ugly and dank. 

Being the first of many such buildings under construction, which we see in wide, slightly dodgy CGI inserts, early adopters of various social strata get to participate in the process of working out the bugs. Of which there are many, including wonky elevators, thermostats and the occasional brown out. The architect of the project, Mr. Royal (wobbly played by Jeremy Irons), resides in a verdant, almost medieval idyll at the top with his crazy wife, who holds Marie Antoinette by way of Gatsby parties for the residents of the upper floors. His vision for the project is "a crucible for change." 

And that it is. 

Or something. 

The filmmaking here felt more like a challenge to disengage with the material. Yes, it is very punk and all, but so what? One can cringe at the bacchanal excesses of the upper floors, observe the emptiness of Dr. Laing's unpacked non-existence, or giggle a bit at Elizabeth Moss's absurd pregnancy belly and her sea of neglected children on the lower floors. This is not so much a story as a montage played out in very slow motion. 

Other than the broadest strokes, the geography and tenants remain ill-formed, ghastly cartoons. High Rise is not a film with any interest in exposition, favouring a fever-dream aesthetic where scenes and ideas do not mesh together cleanly. This is the science fiction nightmare of unfettered capitalism and British gossip. Even though we are pre-Reagan/Thatcher, shit trickles downward. In short order, the building degenerates into cannibalism and chaos. Cocktail parties turn into war parties. The dogs are the first to go.

Lots of the film's characters throw stuff off ledges: iced-cream, garbage, eventually people. Perhaps the intent was to push the boundaries of cinematic grammar, taste and indeed the viewer over the ledge by proxy. Soon after the first act set-up, everything begins to rot like the peaches in the 15th floor supermarket. Anarchy does not so much as build, it was already there, the restraints are just cut away. The rhythms however, are simultaneously too fast and too slow, before things eventually metastasize into a monotonous organ grinder. Absent of nuance, the humour is merely mean. At the end, Mr. Royal laments that he is the architect of his own accident. High Rise, if you will pardon my french, is auteur in that regard. 
Sign-In to Vote
Screen Anarchy logo
Do you feel this content is inappropriate or infringes upon your rights? Click here to report it, or see our DMCA policy.
Ben WheatleyJ. G. Ballardtiff 2015Toronto 2015Toronto Film Festival

More about High Rise

Around the Internet

chuckSeptember 15, 2015 7:37 PM

Well that seals it,now I have to see it.

Ard VijnSeptember 16, 2015 4:44 AM

Sounds like a vertical version of SNOWPIERCER. How do the two compare?
Also, I must see this. And read the book.

Ard VijnSeptember 16, 2015 4:44 AM

Seconded.

AleksSeptember 16, 2015 5:54 AM

Sounds about right. Wheatley's style gets a lot of praise, but the Coens did it decades earlier and infinitely better. Kill List is quite decent though. The rest is nigh on unwatchable.

dustin changSeptember 16, 2015 6:39 AM

Loved Cronenberg's adaptation of Ballard's Crash which also was distant, cold and over the top satire of machine age. I'd love to see this.

KurtSeptember 16, 2015 9:08 AM

It is an apt comparison, similar concept, utterly different execution: Snowpiercer aim for empathy and revolution. High-Rise goes for rot and anarchy.

KurtSeptember 16, 2015 9:09 AM

I adore CRASH top to bottom, I liked the world, and I liked how the ideas were executed and the various performances from the actors. In high-rise, the actors are there to be 'concepts' rather than people.

ExcelsiorDDZSeptember 29, 2015 4:24 AM

This title was sold out for the Saturday viewing and I was unable to see it. :(