SXSW 2017 Review: In 68 KILL, A Bunch of Assholes Hurtle Toward Oblivion

Matthew Gray Gubler and AnnaLynne McCord star in 68 KILL, a modern indie crime exploitation film; Trent Haaga directed.

Editor, U.S. ; Dallas, Texas (@HatefulJosh)
to Vote
SXSW 2017 Review: In 68 KILL, A Bunch of Assholes Hurtle Toward Oblivion

Matthew Gray Gubler's Chip has a really hard time with women in Trent Haaga's scumbags-on-parade exploitationer, 68 Kill.

The story revolves around a white trash heist of $68,000 initiated by Chip's emasculating maniacal girlfriend, Liza (AnnaLynne McCord), who uses her feminine wiles to induce her man into becoming an accessory to all manner of heinous crimes in the name of financial freedom. Chip pretty quickly realizes that his girlfriend is far more out of control than he'd realized after watching her trade sex for rent with their unpleasant landlord. All the while she assures him that it's for the best, simultaneously digging him deeper and deeper into her horrendously twisted plans.

Eventually Chip draws the line when he discovers that Liza's predilections for mania and abnormal behavior run in the family after a run-in with her dopey oaf of a brother Dwayne (Sam Eidson), who has some pretty twisted hobbies of his own. Chip decides he's had enough and goes on the run with a hostage their pair had kidnapped when the simple heist took a predictably sideways turn. Liza gives chase, and the rest of the film follows Chip as he encounters one asshole after another on his way to freedom.

On the surface, 68 Kill has enough going for it to find great success as a modern indie crime exploitation film. Sex, drugs, and violence are in no short supply here, but I do have a really major issue with the film that became evident within the first few minutes. 68 Kill hates women. It really, really hates women.

I've seen enough exploitation films over the years to understand how these things are constructed. There are plenty of films that utilize women as villains in interesting and compelling ways. 68 Kill is not that film. AnnaLynne McCord's portrayal of Liza as a harpy of a woman whose sole purpose on earth is to manipulate the men around here, whether it be Chip, her landlord, or her poor simpleton brother, is incredibly grating and one note.

Liza is evil, which would be fine, if it weren't for the fact that every single thing about her that outlines her evilness is directly attributable negative stereotypes of manipulative women. There is nothing about the Liza character that defines her outside of that character. She is the very embodiment of the kind of woman that men's rights activists insist are everywhere, and that's really hard to watch.

She is far from the only example of horrfically stereotypical shrews in the film. In fact, every single secondary antagonist in the film is a similarly vile example of toxic femininity (if there is such a thing), and every other man in the film is a victim, even the ones trying to kill Chip. It's a strange and upsetting dynamic to behold because at first it seems sort of empowering for the women who are allowed to play those parts usually reserved for men, however, when it becomes clear that all of the women in charge share the exact same traits that are entirely based on gender stereotypes, it feels a lot less evolved.

Chip's flight to freedom is an escape from the shackles of vicious womanhood in a very literal way. What could have been an interesting take on the revenge genre turns into a blood and guts femicide as he exacts his vengeance on these women who have taken everything from him, including his manhood as he is forced to wear women's clothing for half of the film in an attempt by the filmmakers to further victimize him by turning him into the very thing that is attacking him.

I wanted to like this film. I've seen similar films and enjoyed them quite a bit, so it isn't that I don't understand the genre. I understand it quite well, in fact. What I also understand is the fact that if the villains were men and the hero a woman, I can almost guarantee that the men would've had more substance even as henchmen than the manipulative witches in 68 Kill. It's lazy, hateful filmmaking and I can't say that I enjoyed it, try as I might. Better luck next time.

to Vote
Screen Anarchy logo
Do you feel this content is inappropriate or infringes upon your rights? Click here to report it, or see our DMCA policy.
AnnaLynne McCordMatthew Gray GublerSXSW 2017Trent Haaga

More about 68 Kill

Around the Internet

gretchen.zorn@mail.ruMarch 19, 2017 10:01 PM

After leaving behind my old employment twelve month ago, i've had some great luck to discover this web site which was a life-saver as for me... They give projects in which people are able to work on the web from their house. My most recent income after doing work for them for just 4 months was for $4500... Amazing thing about is that the single thing needed is basic typing skills and having access to internet...Read everything regarding it here >>

BOMarch 20, 2017 8:53 AM

Haven't seen 68 Kill yet. But from this review it sounds like Mr. Hurtado should be confined to writing about The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants and Mean Girls sequels.

Todd BrownMarch 20, 2017 1:38 PM

Says someone who CLEARLY knows nothing at all about the sorts of films Josh loves and routinely covers here ...

BOMarch 20, 2017 2:08 PM

I'll take your word for it.

Aditya KripalaniMarch 21, 2017 6:06 AM

That's ridiculous. That's like saying that you should be confined to watching Expendables and fast and the furious sequels. To understand the patterns within a film and it's politics, to understand more about the filmmaker through the art, is the job of a good critic. I'm surprised that you're on a site like screenanarchy and then oblivious to this reality. Most importantly, you haven't seen the film yet. So you've not just judged a person without knowing anything of their work, you also judged a film, without watching it. How is this debate even relevant.

BOMarch 21, 2017 8:26 AM

I agree. How is this debate even relevant?