Cannes 2016 Review: Jeff Nichols' LOVING Is A Minor Key Masterpiece
There may be no more subtle, beautiful and accomplished film this year than Jeff Nichols' Loving. There might also be no film more in need of help being championed, a work surely going to be stampeded in a year where more brash, loud and bombastic films will take all the attention away. Nothing against those works, many of which are quite fine, but in so very many ways Loving is a masterpiece, full stop, one that deserves a far wider audience than I fear it will receive.
Jeff Nichols has been steadily turning out films that prove to be fascinating contributions to the cinematic landscape. From Mud through Take Shelter and this year's Midnight Special he's used his not-so-secret weapon (Michael Shannon) to create complex, riveting portrayals that show heightened reality.
With Loving Nichols has dialed the intensity down to a slow, quiet burn, making his gifts as a filmmaker even more acute. The story of a couple in Virginia who committed the crime of falling in love despite their different racial backgrounds is told as quietly as a murmur, as powerful and lyrically as an epic poem. It's a film whose tonality matches the affections of its leads, never even hinting at histrionics or cinematic bravado.
Based in part on Nancy Buirski's 2011 documentary The Loving Story, the film revolves around Mildred (Ruth Negga) and Joel Edgerton (Richard) and how their relationship inadvertently becomes the stuff of political and legal fodder. Marton Csokas plays a stalwart sheriff free from the overt pandering of such roles, but one still committed to upholding the laws on the books. Nick Kroll plays a young ACLU lawyer over his head, whose commitment to justice is at times hampered by seeing the Lovings as case precedent rather than human beings.
Then there's Shannon, whose brief appearance as a Life Magazine photographer is a wonderful cameo, lifting that scene with a quiet fortitude only matched by the sweetness of the couple that he's photographing.
The film is no hagiography, nor is it didactic and dry. It uses its form to articulately beautifully the content, that the affection for two people is only poisoned by those that wish to interfere. The hurricane may surround them, but for these two individuals the goal isn't to change the law or the world, but to be simply left in piece to snuggle on a couch without prejudice or interference.
The echoes of the case resonate decades later, as civil rights continue to be fought for. Some five decades on the story feels both ancient and present, as we cannot comprehend the vile restrictions of one group while others continue to fight for their own recognition. For the entire film I sat poised waiting for it to devolve into some Kevin Costner-style courtroom bash, with bold proclamations about liberty and a sweeping orchestral film. That film could be made, and Nichols admitted that much to me. Yet, blessedly, this is not that film. This is one where the justices are blurred out, where their actual disembodied voices call upon the lawyers, with the ramifications of the case on point rather than the machinations of the brash lawyers.
There may be no film more important this year, no performances more moving, no film more beautifully and poetically directed than Loving. It's a film of true splendour, patience and loveliness, a showcase of tremendous direction and performance that deserves to be the part of any serious discussion of this year's great films.