SA'YO LAMANG Review
The story of Laurice
Guillen's Sa'yo Lamang is hardly new.
An imperfect but seemingly stable family disintegrates into chaos as one by
one, the family members figure serious conflicts and secrets, whether from the
past or the present, conveniently unravel, threatening the sheen of normalcy
that has sustained the family through the years. From Jeffrey Jeturian's
low-budgeted but elegantly staged Sana
Pag-ibig Na (Enter Love, 1998),
to Wenn Deramas' lowbrow yet unpretentiously enjoyable Ang Tanging Ina (The Only
Mother, 2003), to Joel Lamangan's middling and intolerably weepy Filipinas (2003), to Brillante Mendoza's
highbrow and provocatively stirring Serbis
(Service, 2008), the Filipino
family has been exposed, crumbling in the midst of dire needs or expanding
generation gaps or the simple passage of time.
The family, considered as an
invaluable social element, is a persisting Filipino need. In the absence of it,
a typical Filipino, in his desire to find personal comfort by means of being
part of a social circle, would always seek a replacement. Thus, the idea of the
concept of family dissipating to irrelevance because of
very-real-to-the-point-of-being-cliché eventualities like infidelity, jealousy
or something as natural as death is a gold mine for cinema. The threat to the
family is a fear that is always relatable, no matter how fantastically
conceived. Translated to cinema, where there is always the protection of the
knowledge that whatever tragedy happens onscreen dissipates as soon as the
credits roll and the lights are turned on, the viewer is allowed to be emphatic
to aches of the cinematic family despite the differences between his familial
history to the fictional one depicted onscreen simply because he can relate.
Sa'yo Lamang,
like Guillen's Tanging Yaman (A Change of Heart, 2000), an
earnestly-made soap that explores long-repressed aches among siblings as they
claim their respective shares in the estate of their still-alive mother who is
slowly losing herself to Alzheimer's Disease, borrows its title from religious
songs whose words, if taken away from the backdrop of Catholicism, can also
play like a secular song about love. Sa'yo
Lamang, as opposed to Tanging Yaman which
is explicit in its religiosity in a way that God actually becomes an actual
participant in the narrative, wears its religiosity within the context of a household
of sinners. It's a tricky premise that Guillen interprets deftly and without
having to place judgments by sudden changes in moral perspectives and
personality. In the film, faith, a concept that is as human as the moral
dilemmas and sins that continue to turmoil the film's various characters,
instead of the saving power of the Catholic God, is the thematic center.
Because of this utility of something as universally appreciable as faith
instead of belief systems that are endemic to the Catholicism, the film's often
brushes with prayers and rituals are never obtrusive. Instead, they become rousing
centerpieces of the effectively contoured ensemble drama.
Guillen intelligently frames
her actors during the film's most sublime moments to emphasize their commendable
performances. When Coby (Coco Martin), frustrated that his pregnant
ex-girlfriend (Shaina Magdayao) has been allowed to stay in the family home,
rapes her and in the middle of the rape changes his hateful stares to looks of
pity, mercy, and perhaps, love, Guillen communicates the surprising change of
heart via an extremely tight close-up, allowing her actors, Martin with his
invaluably expressive eyes and Magdayao with her exquisite turn as a woman who
has suffered enough to accept anything as simple turns of fate, to take part in
the storytelling. In another scene, Dianne (Bea Alonzo), after being sobered by
her mother's wishes that she reconcile with her father (Christopher de Leon),
quietly yet achingly explains to her father why it is so difficult to do so.
The room is dimly lit, and Guillen smartly makes use of the limited light and
the persisting shadows to dictate the mood. From a close-up of Alonzo's stoic
face while uttering words that can only devastate her father, the camera zooms
out to reveal De
Lorna Tolentino, who gives
life to the character of Amanda, the mother who single-handedly raised her
children for ten years, consistently delivers a tremendously moving
performance. Starting out as a seemingly weak character as she is left in the
background by Dianne who dominates the household, she shapeshifts, and little
by little, exposing cracks to her character, some of which are reprehensible.
By film's end, without transforming inexplicably, she becomes the most human of
all the characters. Inasmuch as Guillen has poured her mastery of the
filmmaking craft and her personal convictions as a Catholic mother who has
suffered and survived familial hardships through faith to the making of the
film, she generously allows her film to also belong her actors who portray
their roles with a proficiency and sensitivity that is pleasantly surprising
even from the cast-members who've already established reputations as great
actors.
Midway through the film,
Guillen makes use of a flashback, awkward because of the sudden marked
difference in aesthetic but awesome in the sense that it is not only a
flashback for the character, but also to the film's viewers. Illuminated
differently with the faces of Tolentino and De Leon giving off a cool bluish aura
instead of the warm golds and yellows, scripted in a way that every shouted
word contains a powerful emotional charge, blocked in a way that recalls the
most typical of melodramas, the flashback allows a glimpse of an era where
dramas, despite their lack of affinity with how the real world works, always
had something to say, or if it didn't, were at least beautiful pictures that
earned every tear, every sob, and every peso they asked from their viewers. The
flashback felt like it was scene from Guillen's earlier films, films where female
characters were liberated from the bounds of a male-dominated society and took
control of their lives resulting to shouting and crying expeditions, films that
can be very good despite the commercial preconditions of their bankrolling
studios.
Sa'yo Lamang
gives me confidence that Star Cinema and these other mainstream studios will
start respecting the genres they mine for cash. It allows me to believe that capitalist
and artistic aspirations, although theoretically always at war, can also
co-exist as long as integrity, instead of profit motives are the primary
consideration. Star Cinema, there is hope for you yet.
(Cross-published in Lessons from the School of Inattention.)