NYFF 2010: THE SOCIAL NETWORK Review
All right, so I'm a hypocrite:
whenever I see the phrase "hugely entertaining" in a movie review
I cringe, and yet those are exactly the words that occurred to me about
halfway through David Fincher's new film... which, in case you've
been impervious to all the hype (and good for you if you have), is a
kind of modified biopic of Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg.
One of the many reasons I dislike
the "hugely entertaining" descriptor is that I don't know exactly
what it means. Entertaining to whom? And why? It seems to presume that
whatever makes the critic sit there in the dark with a stupid grin is
bound to have the same effect on everyone else.
That said, The Social Network
works so well as a movie precisely because of how, whether calculated
or not, it aims for a brand of entertainment that is at once comforting
(even nostalgic) and excitingly new (even edgy). In this respect
the film represents a triumph of producing more than anything else,
as Scott Rudin and company have brought together talents that one wouldn't
necessarily expect to mesh... but they do, often spectacularly so.
The end result is a satisfying
mix of the familiar and the contemporary, a combo that's going to
win accolades from diverse audiences, and, in the process, push The
Social Network to the head of the line when it comes to industry
awards. Its narrative backbone is a traditional, if unconventional,
rise-to-power drama whose rough outline one could see easily taking
place in a completely different era and involving "old media". Yet the content poured on top
of this structure feels so new that the film barely registers as a period
piece--and maybe it isn't really, because in some sense we're all
still living in the Age of Facebook. To be clear, the film doesn't overtly or
conspicuously seek to paint a historical portrait, to "capture the
zeitgeist" (which almost always feels forced and annoying), but manages
to do so anyway. It's just too busy having fun and trying to drag
us into the party.
If one wanted to indulge in
comparisons, it might be best to think of the rather humorless Citizen
Kane being wedded to the impressive ensemble acting and delicious
zingers of All About Eve. Big names to drop, I know. To be sure,
The Social Network probably lacks the gravitas and/or the formal
innovation that would cause folks to place it on par with such all-time
classics, but there should be little doubt that it belongs with the
best of what Hollywood has to offer us at the moment. Of course there
are many other antecedents that the average film buff can probably identify
for The Social Network. At the NYFF press conference writer Aaron
Sorkin referenced Rashomon, and Fincher seemed to concur. So
if that was a conscious source of inspiration, who am I to argue? Since
the story unfolds as flashbacks presented as depositions given in two
different legal proceedings, sure, citing Kurosawa makes sense.
In Rashomon, however,
the different stories were radically incompatible with each other so
that, as every Film 101 student knows, we eventually question
the nature of "truth" (or "reality") itself, coming to appreciate
instead its constructed nature. The Social
Network, by contrast, isn't about trying to puzzle out "what
really happened"--rather, it represents an impressive case of making-do
with the contradictions of multiple conflicting accounts. Yes, the script
is based on a book by Ben Mezrich, but where nonfiction can bob and
weave enough to draw a reasonably believable composite picture, occasionally
pointing out its own limitations, a feature-length dramatic film can't
get away with that much: in the middle of a reality-based drama, you
don't want the audience to question the reality part too much or else
you lose part of the spell that the picture casts. That's why what
Sorkin and Fincher have achieved here is subtly impressive beyond it obvious impressiveness: The Social Network stitches together
a lot of gray area material to fashion a product that is anything but
gray. Some might criticize it, like any docudrama, for its lack of faithfulness
to the facts, but I'm not acquainted with the historical sources,
so I can't comment directly. The sharpness that I'm so amazed that
the creative team pulled off doesn't relate to veracity at all, but
rather to how the script refuses to take sides yet remains compelling.
All of this praise, by the
way, surprises me most of all since I'm hardly an Aaron Sorkin fan.
But credit where it's due, he has crafted the wittiest mainstream
movie I've seen in a long, long time, his dialogue moving between
the kind of memorably aphoristic turns of phrase one expects from a
topshelf stage comedy and the effortlessly clever and "hip" wisecracks
of Joss Whedon at his best. Still, all of the script's great one-liners
would remain dead on the page if it weren't for the terrific comic
timing of the cast. Kudos to lead Jesse Eisenberg and the rest of the
headliners, but even the secondary or tertiary characters get a chance
to shine, the script is that generous. That also happens to be another
reason The Social Network harkens back to Golden Age Hollywood--we
might not admire most of the characters, but we enjoy being around them
since they're all smart or funny, or both, the script in effect creating
an alternate universe we want to visit because it's a place where
everyone always knows exactly the right thing to say.
So while one expects Fincher
to excel at the layered, complex storytelling from his work in Fight
Club and Zodiac, it's all the sparkling dialogue and effective
character development where he really surprises. Is The Social Network
a perfect film? Far from it. Its high-energy and intelligence mask a
lot of dramatic shortcuts--seams in a fabric that the screenplay tries
to present as seamless. Intellectual epiphanies come to Zuckerberg in
lightning bolts, and characters signal their immediate feelings for
each other in a way that suggests that few relationships evolve over
time. In one scene Andrew Garfield's character engages in a crucial
phone call while his unhinged girlfriend starts a fire in the background,
and that's just one example of condensation and efficiency that may
be too smart for its own good. You do too much of that and you've
created the typically glib and artificial Hollywood drama. Such devices
are perhaps holdovers from Sorkin's long stint in television, where
coincidence and similar impurities of plot help move hour-long episodes
along.
Well, certainly there's much, much more that could be said about The Social Network, and that's one of the nice things about the film. It keeps one laughing and prompts immediate responses on several fronts--which I guess is the category under which these quick impressions of mine belong. But The Social Network is also bound to trigger countless animated, post-movie coffee shop discussions among those who see it. And that kind of bringing together, of connection and creative give-and-take, is both ironic and fitting, given that it's a film about a man who doesn't seem to connect well with anyone... and yet who built one of the mightiest forms of mass connection our culture has known to date.
[Editor's note: Perhaps needless to say the NYFF screenings are sold out for tonight. The Social Network opens wide in North America, October 1st.]
The Social Network
Director(s)
- David Fincher
Writer(s)
- Aaron Sorkin (screenplay)
- Ben Mezrich (book)
Cast
- Jesse Eisenberg
- Rooney Mara
- Bryan Barter
- Dustin Fitzsimons