I SAW THE DEVIL review

Featured Critic; St. Louis, MO
Sign-In to Vote
I SAW THE DEVIL review
Once upon a time, Hank Williams sang "I Saw the Light". Today, filmmaker Jee-woon Kim gives us "I Saw the Devil". As a quick (and admittedly unlikely) exercise in compare and contrast, this shift from light to dark, from God to the devil, could be considered indicative of how far the global popular culture has fallen. But when one stops to consider, as it's been pointed out elsewhere in detailing the torrid life of the great country singer (by singer/songwriter Paul Thorn, who said the following), Hank Williams was in the darkness when he sang "I Saw the Light".

An alcoholic and chronic screw-up, Williams had to experience that palpable darkness of life before he could honestly recognize the light. In his new torture/revenge epic film, South Korean horror icon Jee-woon's dares to drag the viewer on a no-holds-barred trip through some of the most deranged darkness committed to film in recent time. He competently forces our gaze upon acts of obsession and hate that I would not wish upon my worst enemies. Coming out of the theater, yes, the light was refreshingly brighter than usual - even on the dismal-weathered day that it was. I was rattled and thankful to be done watching "I Saw the Devil". And so the question stands, what light do we see from this experience, and is it possibly worth it?

The never-explained evocation of "the Devil" in the title of this film brings up a sort of black and white, good against evil moral struggle. On the surface of the story, yes, there is a hero and villain (Byung-hun Lee and Mik-sik Choi, respectively). A psychotic cab driver named Kyung-Chul (his raw, matter-of-fact sickness gives Travis Bickle a run for his money) makes a habit of capturing, murdering, and dismembering attractive young women - and that's just part of it. After the pregnant wife of Kim Soo-hyeon, a highly trained South Korean secret agent, becomes his first victim in the story, the hunter becomes the hunted. But, as the twisted tale unfolds, this sense of deceptively clear morality becomes quickly knotted, both within the soul of the main character, and within the viewer's guts.

"I Saw the Devil" is as much of a brutal endurance test as it is a well-made film. It has a no-nonsense drive that fuels every bloody second. It is gripping, horrific, graphic, and oh my gosh is it long - at two and a half hours, and two false conclusions, Jee-woon may've made the "Heat" of the torture horror sub-genre.

Actually, that said, it's interesting to note that although Jee-woon Kim is known for his work in horror, and "I Saw the Devil" thematically fits the mold of torture horror (I much prefer the term "torture horror" over the more widely used but terribly misleading "torture porn"), I can't sign off on this as a bona-fide horror film in the same way I'd consider the work of Eli Roth or the "Saw" series horror. Yes, the brutality is comparable if not exceeding those examples, but the fact that so much of the film revolves around a protagonist's revenge that we can't help but sympathize with - at least at first - the dread factor is replaced with a sort of continuous moral see-saw, fixing our attention upon inhuman actions that we at once root for and are fundamentally repulsed by.

The long running time only reinforces this aspect, as again and again, our hero pursues the sadistic killer, catching him in the act, savagely dismembers and terrorizes him, then releases him so that they can eventually repeat this process. This agonizing catch/release villain torture drives Kim Soo-hyeon to the edge of sanity and reason even as it inches toward an inevitable endgame. A viewer of weaker (or even normal) constitution may wonder if that endgame will ever arrive. Be assured that it does, and when it does, it does nothing to alleviate the unsettling nature of the overall film.

While it's true that "I Saw the Devil" is essentially a series of intense how-much-can-you-take set pieces, it does thankfully take a moment from time to time to question the moral nature of revenge. The soul-consuming actions of Kim Soo-hyeon are directly identified as such through dialogue, as well as in round-about ways through vague Judeo-Christian iconography, such as angel wings, crosses, and crucifixes which adorn the locations and wardrobe of key characters (including the demented killer himself).

The notion of a film that criticizes sadistic actions by presenting them in an upfront manner - thus in way becoming what it's criticizing - is not new. And while I can't pretend to have fully reconciled the moral conundrum this sort of art presents, I think I can safely say that if you haven't made some sort of peace with the notion, this is the wrong movie for you. It goes without saying that this is not for the squeamish.

It's been said before, but we live in violent times, and for all the often valid criticism Eli Roth and his fellow torture-meisters have generated, I am all but certain that the best of their work (yes, I believe there is some social relevance to the "Hostel" films, even if they are undeniably indulgent) will stand the test of time as examples of where our culture was at the time of their creation.

Here in the U.S., not all that much has changed from the Bush era to the current reign of Obama, but the fact that we really just wish it would has forced that brand of horror off of Western screens, and back into a remake-fueled place of nebulousness and non-identity. It is a shift from outrage to denial brought on by outrage-fatigue. Our meta-consciousness may be getting a break from the way brutal human-on-human horror films force our collective gaze, but, dare I say it, the vital art of the horror film may be suffering a crisis of denial. Hitting American screens a good three years too late to cash in on the now dormant torture horror trend, it's kind of a wonder that "I Saw the Devil" is getting any kind of domestic theatrical run at all. As difficult as it is, it may be more relevant than ten "Piranha 3-D"s combined. As an expertly crafted gory revenge thriller/horror film, "I Saw the Devil" offers a difficult light of truth on our troubled times.

Now, with all of that said, excuse me while I cue up my Hank Williams record...

- Jim Tudor

Sign-In to Vote
Screen Anarchy logo
Do you feel this content is inappropriate or infringes upon your rights? Click here to report it, or see our DMCA policy.
Jee-woon KimHoon-jung ParkByung-hun LeeMin-sik ChoiIn-seo KimHo-jin ChunActionCrimeDrama

More about I Saw The Devil

Major_RagerMarch 25, 2011 9:53 AM

Your final paragraph is the hammer that hit the nail on the head. Great review!

AirchinapilotMarch 25, 2011 11:47 AM

I saw it thanks to the Twitch offer and while I agree with most of the points in the review I can't say that I enjoyed it a whole lot. The catch and release rhythm is something I accepted more for the idea than the execution. That said, I enjoyed very much Mik-sik Choi's performance which blew away the hero in every way.

arturoMarch 27, 2011 11:23 AM

A great revenge film, one of the best out there....I loved it.. Also check out The Man From Nowhere, Korean cinema rocks BIG time..

ChrisKMarch 29, 2011 2:15 PM

Excellent review Jim! This was one of the best movies I have seen along with Dream Home. Your Hank Williams connection is spot on. I loved the director's little visual references to Choi Min-Sik's other films as well: The angel wings on the mirror for Oldboy and the red boxing gloves for Crying Fist. This movie gives you more each time you watch it. The dinner scene with the cannibals is just one of the many treats in store for the viewer. As far as Eli Roth is concerned, he could never make a movie this good.

navajoMay 26, 2011 2:01 PM

I watched this movie surrounded by the hype from all the reviews on the web. I have to disagree with many who gave this movie top ratings. No doubt it has entertainment value including high shock and gore factor but this movie suffers from what many other korean movies have.. the overindulgence of the director. The movie could have ended 30mins earlier but the director just wanted to pull more twists to showcase how 'clever' he is suppose to be. He wants to wring every bit of emotion out of the viewer. Somewhere the plot got tiresome and stupid. The cat and mouse game became silly. Mistakes in direction became evident with poor screenplay. The discontinuous editing (cheap) tricks only served to annoy me further.
I did enjoy the first hour but i was irritated by the end. Just end it 30mins earlier and i would have stopped at enjoyment.

navajoMay 26, 2011 2:16 PM

Just thinking about this movie gets me annoyed and i have to add on. How silly can a movie be if the main serial killer meets and bumps into other serial killers? They even have a 'club'? I could accept if it was a dark comedy but clearly this wasn't the what the director intended. How much suspension of disbelief to we have hold? The film depicts there are 101 serial killers/rapists roaming around south korea???
Anyway, the reviewer here did a good job reviewing. I have to go watch a comedy now to simmer down.