[In
light of his 'secret handshake' anonymity in Canadian film-circles, and
a brief encounter at Fantasia this year with yours truly, you will see a
few of these ScreenAnarchy Retro reviews focusing on the cinema of
underground/indie filmmaker Larry Kent: the godfather of Indie Canadian
cinema whose filmography spans well over 40 years. For more background
check out Michael Guillen's conversation/interview with Kent. One
can pretend that if ScreenAnarchy had been in existence from the origins of
cinema, rather than merely the early 21st century, that we would have
been covering Kent and many of his Cinepix brethren during the 1960s and
1970s.]
All Tom and Bill need is a car and a couple of loose women in their immediate future, or so they think. When given the chance with a prostitute from their more well-to-do (he has a car) fellow student, they are all bravado and little follow through. Right on the cusp of being kids and adults they know that the future is a vague, undefined time, but hormones are right here and right now. Tom is torn between listening to his brains and his genitals as the end of high-school approaches. He has a scholarship nearly in hand, but is itching to lose his virginity in one manner or another. He has an eye for buxom Elaine, a sharp dresser if a little vacant upstairs which fails to let him notice the stunning (to these eyes) Kathy, his study partner, and purveyor of good coffee and casual banter. Sweet Substitute plays out Tom's cluelessness (or his reaction to peer pressure) with the lead character more a passive observer than active participant. Perhaps this a flaw in some regards; a failing of young men that Kent grasps onto. When Tom does make a stand in the final moments - one that was rigorously at odds with the expectations of this viewer, particularly in light of the era of budding flower-children and counter-cultures, it feels like the karmic wheel should come around in an epilogue. Perhaps the emasculation of the lead in High (played by Lanny Beckman who as Bill here is the architect of the Sweet Substitutes climax) is a revenge of sorts by the filmmaker. As ugly as the re-evaluation of Tom might be in light of his choices and choice of friends, the film captures a certain kind of moral failure (at the end of an era of moral certitude) in stark black and white. And life goes on.
[Up Next: The Hamster Cage -- but after a short hiatus for TIFF11]