David Cronenberg vs. Don DeLillo: COSMOPOLIS

Contributor; Queens, New York (@jaceycockrobin)
to Vote
David Cronenberg vs. Don DeLillo: COSMOPOLIS
Once again, The higher-ups at ScreenAnarchy have been kind enough to allow me to cross-promote a post I wrote over at LitReactor. Last time it was a comparison piece on the book and both film versions of The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. This time, it's David Cronenberg's adaptation of Don DeLillo's novel, Cosmopolis.

There is a specter haunting the world of literary adaptations and it is this: the book is always better than the film.

But there are exceptions to this rule-- especially where the output of director David Cronenberg is concerned. The 69-year-old auteur has never been one to shy away from difficult source material (see: Naked Lunch, Crash), and has generally been successful at shepherding the unfilmable to the silver screen (see: Naked Lunch, Crash). Most directors stop taking risks at a certain stage in their career, but not Cronenberg. Case in point, his adaptation of one of the oddest road novel's of all time: Don DeLillo's prescient take on the haves versus the have-nots, The Dark Knight Ri-- I mean, Cosmopolis.

You can check out the whole thing over at LitReactor. It is essentially a movie review masquerading as a book review.

Cosmopolis opened this past Friday in the US at select theaters. 

Also, the title of this post no way implies that the director and author are f-f-f-feuding. From what I've heard, DeLilllo quite likes the adaptation.  What does everyone else think?

to Vote
Screen Anarchy logo
Do you feel this content is inappropriate or infringes upon your rights? Click here to report it.

More about Cosmopolis

blog comments powered by Disqus